Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST IN: Kari Lake and Mark Finchem Take Lawsuit to Ban Voting Machines to The US Supreme Court with New Allegations of Illegal Machine Certification
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 3/15/2024 | Jordan Conradson

Posted on 03/15/2024 4:03:14 PM PDT by bitt

Kari Lake and Mark Finchem appealed their lawsuit to ban the use of electronic voting machines to the United States Supreme Court on Thursday.

This comes after the 2022 election, where 60% of the voting machines were reportedly programmed to fail on election day, causing mass voter disenfranchisement and up to four-hour-long lines for Republican in-person voters.

The filing includes “new allegations,” some of which were previously mentioned in Kari Lake’s lawsuit to overturn the stolen election, including:

First, Maricopa did not conduct the required L&A testing, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.

Second, Maricopa did not use certified software, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.

Third, Maricopa used software that made all passwords needed to control Maricopa elections available to anyone with physical or remote access, which supports petitioners’ allegations and evidence that past elections were manipulated.

Fourth, altering election software without the Arizona Secretary of State’s approval is criminal act under Arizona law, A.R.S. §§16-449(A), 16- 452(C), 16-1009, 16-1004(B), 16-1010, thereby evaporating presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).

Fifth, Maricopa’s officials misrepresented their compliance with Arizona election law (e.g., L&A testing, certified software), which negates any presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).

Sixth, Maricopa officials abdicated control over the complex election systems to embedded private Dominion employees who lack any presumption of regularity under Arizona law. See note 4, infra.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arizona; karilake; maricopa; maricopacounty; supremecourt; votingmachines

1 posted on 03/15/2024 4:03:14 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 03/15/2024 4:03:26 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Free and fair elections? Yeah, right 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬


3 posted on 03/15/2024 4:16:55 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; All

Good. Maybe this will shine sunlight on the topic for other states to address.(I doubt it).


4 posted on 03/15/2024 4:17:12 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bantam

Hay, it was the most perfect election EVER!


5 posted on 03/15/2024 4:18:43 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Tina Peters, anyone?


6 posted on 03/15/2024 4:27:23 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Supremes will dismiss claiming no standing, citing ther dismisal of Texas.


7 posted on 03/15/2024 4:29:11 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (The history of the present Federal Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The cowards on the SC won’t go near this issue.


8 posted on 03/15/2024 5:12:45 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
Supremes will dismiss claiming no standing, citing ther dismisal of Texas.

The Roberts court will live in infamy as the court that ended free and fair elections in the U.S.
9 posted on 03/15/2024 5:16:17 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Ban electronic voting machines is not a court choice. Will they even hear it?


10 posted on 03/15/2024 5:52:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

good. our side gotta keep pushing. if nothing more than making sure all the fraud is documented, in case we get another chance at America. may God bless and help them in their lawsuit.


11 posted on 03/15/2024 7:44:39 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Please keep security with you all the time.
Love you!


12 posted on 03/15/2024 8:28:24 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Bye done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson