Posted on 04/25/2024 12:55:09 PM PDT by Az Joe
There are no statute of limitations on murder.
-PJ
-PJ
If YOU think what they’re doing to TRUMP is a crime, wait until they turn their undivided attention to YOU!
TRUTH & POLITICAL CORRECTNESS (4 MINUTES)
LARRY GRATHWOHL & WHAT HAPPENS TO THOSE WHO RESIST THE COMING MARXIST DEMOCRAT “PARADISE”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15HSTmmWtJM
I DO NOT MONETIZE MY VIDEOS. PLEASE SHARE!
Let's be clear about something...
No Congress would protect a President who was credibly accused of murder from impeachment and conviction. Not even Schumer would block a conviction in the Senate if Biden actually murdered someone while in office.
There is no reason to bypass the impeachment process with such extreme outlier cases as murder, coup d'etat, etc. If something like that were to actually happen, then impeach, convict, and then indict and try. We don't need a debate on the boundaries of immunity in such outlandish cases when the Constitutional remedy is already in place.
The only reason to entertain such fantasy is if they believe that Congress is so rabidly partisan that they would excuse even murder to maintain power. The solution to such a wild proposition is to elect a better Congress, not to invent new categories of separation of powers like "official duties" and "private duties."
-PJ
Given the wildly extreme hypotheticals discussed this morning, one would think that impeachment and conviction would be practically automatic if credible evidence of murder or selling nuclear weapons to enemies was produced.
I don't believe the "passage of time" departure from the Presidency opens up the President to be charged for anything he did in office that the opposition didn't like. I believe the "impeach, convict, indict, and prosecute" model implies the opposite too, that is, absent impeachment and conviction, a former President cannot be indicted and prosecuted for acts undertaken while President.
-PJ
It’s so vague that perhaps nobody will understand that it’s supposed to be biden. But that is likely for vague art.
this article and the way it is framed and the quote are more lefty stalin propoganda-repeat it often enough and people will accept it,
Yes, but it shows the despair of the Leftists even there.
SCOTUS knows this is, all of it, just bullshit.
“The President should not be immune from murder, for example.”
Definitely true.
Of course he wouldn’t be immune in that hyperbolic situation. [SMH]
If the SCOTUS allows this to go forward, all living past presidents heads are on the chopping block.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.