So does this mean Trump and his attorneys can not know the accusers? So anyone (in their case) can make up stuff/misinformation and there is no way to cross examine or prove the misinformation?
1 posted on
03/30/2024 10:18:47 AM PDT by
blueyon
To: blueyon
Pence wants it to be a surprise.
2 posted on
03/30/2024 10:20:35 AM PDT by
PTBAA
To: blueyon
Release the names to Trump’s lawyers. In confidence of course.
3 posted on
03/30/2024 10:22:16 AM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: blueyon
Star Chamber
4 posted on
03/30/2024 10:26:15 AM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: blueyon
So much for Amendment 6:”...in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
5 posted on
03/30/2024 10:28:56 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: blueyon
How can Trump’s defense prepare if the witnesses are not known to them? I seem to recall something about having the right to face your accusers.
7 posted on
03/30/2024 10:33:17 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: blueyon
I guess the old you have a right to know your accusers is no longer in affect
8 posted on
03/30/2024 10:33:19 AM PDT by
blueyon
(God, is who we need)
To: blueyon
11 posted on
03/30/2024 10:37:31 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Ne supra crepidam.)
To: blueyon
Hope she tells Jack to hit the road, Defendants have the right to know.
13 posted on
03/30/2024 11:03:42 AM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: blueyon
the special counsel, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland the special counsel, illegally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland
14 posted on
03/30/2024 11:08:29 AM PDT by
rx
To: blueyon
Jack doesn’t want anyone to see the docs in question, including the defense.
Jack doesn’t want defense to know who the witnesses will be.
Jack wants the trial to be pre-tracked toward a designed verdict.
Jack is not in DC or NY.
17 posted on
03/30/2024 11:27:27 AM PDT by
lurk
(u)
To: blueyon
They’re testifying against a U.S. President, because Trump is actually the President
today. What are those witnesses, and Jack Smith afraid of? If they shield those witnesses’ names, this will be an even bigger fraud than it already is.
19 posted on
03/30/2024 11:52:14 AM PDT by
mass55th
(“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
To: blueyon
22 posted on
03/30/2024 1:49:55 PM PDT by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson