Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I think it would be wise to stop condemning these women.

Maybe they were nut cases, over sensitive or whatever, but the point is WE DO NOT know that.

What we do know is that these women did not make this situation public. As far as anyone knows, they’ve never said a word in the last years.

When they made the complaints, it was certainly not to take Cain down in politics. Mr. Cain was not in politics nor was there any reason to think he ever would be.

Why condemn these women because they won’t speak now?

I wouldn’t speak either. I would stay far away from the publicity and hate that would follow me if I said anything.

These women are not to blame for Cain’s current troubles.

Although calling them troubles is a bit of a reach since he seems to be profiting from them.


71 posted on 11/05/2011 6:52:05 AM PDT by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: altura

I think Cain was kind of a benign predator — the mildest kind - never intending to hurt anyone or perhaps even actually do anything more than joking. Now maybe most any man can be described that way at times. But really good husbands would never even create that appearance. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.


116 posted on 11/05/2011 9:41:04 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson