[AD from SpringBay]

This morning for the first time I heard she's in her 50’s which would have made her at least 40 at the time.

That is a good observation. Now imagine this gal is a hog and has been for a few decades and that she has several such sexual harassment charges throughout her professional career. If/when people saw that it might shut this whole mess down and they wouldn't want that either. I think we're seeing the creation of a straw-man in reverse, a created personality speaking through her lawyers. It's hard to defeat an opponent who only speaks from behind the curtain.

[Springfield Reformer]

Good point. If she had a pattern of repeatedly abusing the system via bogus sexual harassment claims, that would be a great reason to keep her anonymous. This is why the 6th amendment made it into the constitution. You can never get to justice if you can’t openly confront your accuser.

[eazdzit]

Hi AD,

Clear back in the 70's it was common practice for women who had been “let go”, to claim sexual harassment as the reason for leaving their last job on their next job application.

You can bet this gal has too much baggage to want disclosure.

Who is paying the lawyer? Me thinks this lawyer is a lieyer with motive.

Chears :>) easy does it.