Self-Amplifying RNA Shots Are Coming: The Untold Danger

Epoch Times ^ | Nov 29, 2023 | Klaus Steger

[grey_whiskers]

The next generation of RNA-based injections will contain self-amplifying RNA (saRNA). If the term “self-amplifying RNA” sounds frightening, it should. It likely brings to mind images of scientific experiments run amok. As discussed in a previous article, “mRNA vaccines” are not made with messenger RNA but with modified RNA (modRNA). These so-called vaccines are actually gene therapy products (GTPs), as modRNA hijacks our cells’ software. We have no possibility at all to gain influence on modRNA (or saRNA) after it has been injected.

[grey_whiskers]

Genie's out of the bottle. China can pursue this and weaponize it even if we shut it down.

[mewzilla]

Refuse to comply.

If enough of us finally do that, this **** will end.

[grey_whiskers]

*PING*

A next generation of clot shots, with modifications to the already-modified mRNA to extend the expression/persistence in the body.

There has already been talk of mRNA being aerosolized. If just talk, or feasibly, or already under testing, I don’t know.

IF it has been, ...

Combine the persistent self-replicating mRNA, with coding for, not spike protein, but a protein already known to be deadly in short order.

Spread the aerosol by drones.

Instant depopulation.

/worst case scenario>

Bill Gates and other WEF types pleased.

In before the $hot $hill$ show up.

[MayflowerMadam]

I hope all the sheep decide to get this, and we can wait for nature to step in and do its job.

[bk1000]

Mandatory injections of RNA will be shortly followed with involuntary injections of copper and lead by the recipients of the former. No question.

[grey_whiskers]

By the way, there is some good discussion of this over at ZeroHedge (which I am not allowed to post on FR).

The conversation contains a snippet of back and forth between the scientists critiquing this, and the $hot $hill$ over there trying to shout down any problems with the usual “Because SCIENCE™!” where they knowingly lie through their teeth about it, both overtly and by omission.

[iontheball]

Genie’s out of the bottle. China can pursue this and weaponize it even if we shut it down.
_________________________
Here we have two catch-22s - AI and gene modification-engineered ‘therapy’ that threaten mankind with no way to stop either.

[TalBlack]

Self amplifying/feedback loop.

[exDemMom]

The modification of the mRNA used in the vaccines is to change a uracil into a pseudouracil as a way to stop the innate immune system from destroying the mRNA as soon as it is injected. Pseudouracil is a naturally occurring nucleotide, just as uracil is. Messenger RNA that contains pseudouracil is still messenger RNA, just like messenger RNA that contains non-standard bases in place of C, A, and G.

Other than making the injected mRNA less noticeable to the innate immune system, the pseudouracil behaves exactly like uracil. The RNA modification enzymes in your body treat it exactly like uracil. This means that the ribosomes read it, the transfer RNAs recognize it, and the RNAses that destroy RNA destroy mRNA containing pseudouracil exactly the same way that they destroy mRNA containing uracil.

For people who are interested in learning more about self-replicating RNA (srRNA), I have linked a review:

Next generation self-replicating RNA vectors for vaccines and immunotherapies.

The srRNA does not last forever in the body; no RNA does. The benefit of it being self-replicating is that it replaces itself almost as fast as it is destroyed in the cell, meaning that it can direct the production of a desired protein product for an extended period of time compared to regular mRNAs (including vaccine mRNA).

The Epoch Times seems to be on a mission to scare the pants off of conservatives by using words and concepts that they do not understand. I wonder what the ideology of the owners of that publication really is, because I don't think they like conservatives at all.

[Bob434]

Speaking of self amplifying, I’ve noticed lately that TV is doing that lately- not just during com ercisls either. Will be watching at a comfortable sound level, then wham- sound incr3ases all on its own- gotta sit with thumb on he volume button at night when oHers are sleepin. Commercials,are also now a ping their gets too again it seems

But back tO subject- gosh- I can’t wait to NOT take the shots again.

[wjcsux]

“ In before the $hot $hill$ show up.”

Me too my FRiend.

[Paladin2]

Sorcerer’s Apprentice...

[packagingguy]

One big reason the Covid vaccines failed was the antigen changed.

Not that I’m a virologist but saw an article be one scientist who predicted this.

The article stated coronaviruses mutate quickly.

Then I looked up the childhood vaccine schedule and not one vaccine to a coronavirus was there.

mRNA vaccines might work someday, but then again we were promised gene therapy in 1990 and it’s still not here.

[Honest Nigerian]

Dear exDemMo
What is your mission?
Where did you go to school?
What degrees and credentials do you hold?
Self-proclaimed infectious disease specialist is not a legitimate legit designation.

[null and void]

EVERYTHING biden does either:

a) Weakens America/Americans
b) Distances America's allies
c) Strengthens America's enemies
d) Attacks Christianity
e) Serves islam
f) Harms Israel
Or some combination of the above.
AND
g) Makes him & his family richer

No "OFF" switch.
What could possibly go wrong?

The government wants to disarm us after 247 yrs 'cuz they plan to do are doing things we would shoot them for!

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." ~ Putt's Law

[neverevergiveup]

When the term ‘gene therapy’ was first coined, the idea was that there would be nucleic acid-based treatments for genetic diseases - like cystic fibrosis. After decades of work it became apparent that gene therapy had lots of road blocks - including inability to sufficiently regulate the amount of gene product made, inability to get the gene or gene-product to the affected cells at high enough and sustainable levels, immune reactions against specific viral vectors, etc.

It became clear that the easiest ‘gene therapy’ targets were those that required only a relatively small number of readily accessible cells targeted (e.g. DNA and RNA vaccines in which genetic material is injected into a relatively small area of muscle in order to produce a protein product that will induce an immune reaction), and those conditions or clinical targets that required a secreted gene product (made in the cells into which the DNA/RNA was injected, and then secreted from those cells into the surrounding tissues or bloodstream).

That's how we came to our current situation. The difficult problems in gene therapy were preventing commercialization, and the easier roads (DNA and RNA vaccines, microRNA) were thus concentrated on.

What I'm trying to say is that our current use of gene-based therapeutics is the result of a technology in search of a commercializable application, not a technology specifically developed to address an unmet need. That difference is a huge one, and going down the this path can be irresponsible and unpredictably harmful.

[null and void]

No "OFF" switch...

[grey_whiskers]

(Yawns).

Hi Dingbat.

It's funny how you repackage and reword the contents of the original article so as to appear that you are refuting it.

The original article says:

The term “self-amplifying” is self-explanatory: saRNA replicates itself repeatedly, which is not natural, as natural mRNA is always (without exception) transcribed from DNA (this is called the “central dogma of molecular biology”). Compared to modRNA, a small amount of saRNA results in an increased amount of produced antigen; one shot of saRNA-based injection may be enough to generate sufficient antibodies against a virus.

Both saRNA and modRNA represent the blueprint for a viral protein, which, after entering our cells, will be produced by our cell machinery (i.e., ribosomes).

Scientists created the genetically modified modRNA sequence by replacing natural uridines with synthetic methyl-pseudouridines to generate a maximum amount of viral antigen. This modification is the basis of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 shots.

Unlike modRNA, saRNA does not contain methyl-pseudouridines, but uridines. Why? Since saRNA self-replicates and synthetic methyl-pseudouridines are not available in our cells, saRNA must rely on natural uridines that exist in our cells. Our cells will produce foreign proteins using their own cell machinery and their own natural resources—the main reason these cells finally become exhausted.

However, this causes a significant problem: mRNA is highly unstable and, therefore, has only a short lifespan—too short for our immune system to produce sufficient antibodies. The solution to this problem is the second difference between modRNA and saRNA.

Unlike modRNA, saRNA contains an additional sequence for the replicase, as destroyed (by RNases) saRNA must be replaced by new saRNA.

As natural mRNA will never self-replicate, saRNA definitely represents a genetically modified RNA (modRNA).

Put simply, saRNA is just another type of modRNA.

Have you called Dr. Malone yet to see if he has resumed the crusade in favor of the clot-shots because SCIENCE!™ ?

[grey_whiskers]

Coronaviruses in general mutate quickly.

Nobody had ever created a successful one-shot vaccine for a coronavirus before.

So it was something between a fool’s mission, and a lie, to sell the mRNA clot shots as “safe and effective”.

OK, it was a baldfaced lie, since the Pharma companies lied about multiple aspects of the safety profile of the clot shots in their hurried, incomplete, rushed through testing.