Posted on 11/21/2008 7:15:36 PM PST by Nick Thimmesch
LOS ANGELES -- A Missouri woman's daughter says her mother had wanted an Internet account shut down even before cruel messages were sent from it to a teenage neighbor who later committed suicide.
Sarah Drew says her mother, Lori, initially thought it was a good idea to use the account to create a fictitious boy to lure Megan Meier into an online relationship.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/11/21/PH2008112100700.jpg
This Sept. 4, 2008 file photo shows Lori Drew, a Missouri woman who allegedly perpetrated a MySpace hoax that drove her daughter’s 13-year-old classmate to suicide, leaves court in Los Angeles. The case of U.S. vs. Lori Drew is viewed in legal circles as landmark Internet law, but as outlined in government documents with its neighborhood feuds and a teen’s suicide it reads more like a plot line for a made-for-TV drama. (AP Photo/Nick Ut) (Nick Ut - AP)
no adult should have the right to attack verbally a minor.
What a cold b!tch!
i think this mom is a creep, but she isn’t why this girl killed herself. the girl had problems and while tragic, the creepy mom isn’t responsible IMO.
you could be right.
but, i expect higher standards of adults, especially mothers where children are involved.
Looks like a dumb ass mom living through her daughter and getting involved in her daughter’s junior high school dramas
Yes and she was aware that the girl had problems. She meant to do harm and she did.
I hope the mangy tramp gets 20 years in prison.
And that her daughter marries Janet Reno.
This "Mother" didn't give a damn before or after this girl killed herself because of this sicked and twisted scheme she concocted to intentionally hurt and humiliate her. She is very much responsible for this girl's death.And the worst part is that she hasn't even shown regret until she found out that she would be put on trial.
And that her daughter marries Janet Reno.
LOL that was funny!

Lori Drew
I don’t understand why they gave the assistant immunity for testifying. She was perhaps more at fault than the mother. The assistant was the one who sent the final, hateful message that sent this poor girl into despair.
This mother, her assistant, and the daughter are all despicable. I hope the three of them spend the rest of their lives as pariahs.
lol! Becomes Janet Reno’s pet chihuahua
“I dont understand why they gave the assistant immunity for testifying.”
Yes, I don’t understand that either. In fact, I read a rather detailed article about this in the New Yorker and I don’t remember the assistant being mentioned at all.
But that was before anyone was charged, I think.
And why is this trial in LA?
This woman is some creepy dame though, and the assistant. I mean, who has time to do stuff like this?
There are some very demented people, just running around loose in this world.
Kids will do whatever: it is up to parents to prevent anything dangerous from happening. That’s our job.
The trial is in LA, because the charges have to do with the misuse of the site (or something to that effect), and that is where the company that owns the site is located.
Strange, I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.